Both hitler and stalin were both military masterminds although their immoralities tend to to a great extent outweigh their good workss they were both adept propogandists and were amoral and willing to make whatever they could to break their state they were besides both rather paranoiac and good strategians. Joseph stalin as depicted in soviet propaganda joseph stalin was the leader of soviet russia from the mid-1920s until his death in 1953 though stalin and adolf hitler never met or spoke, their lives and their fates were inextricably linked. Given this, both hitler and stalin were different sides of the same totalitarian coin you can also order a custom essay, term paper, thesis, dissertation or research paper on hitler and stalin from our professional custom writing service which provides high-quality custom written papers.
I would point out just one difference between hitler and stalin, as they are being compared too often in many fields: he admitted the country needed the military elites that were imprisoned in the great purges and let those military professionals do their job. Tim snyder’s ambitious bloodlands set out to place the murderous regimes of the third reich and stalin’s soviet union in their overlapping european contextssnyder proceeded from the central observation that the annihilation fantasies of hitler and stalin were to a large part played out in the same space: ‘in the middle of europe, in the middle of the twentieth century, the nazi and. The worst were the nazis under hitler, followed by communists under stalin the holocaust and the fate of the jewish people is the best known piece of all this but sadly it is not the only one in the west, even the holocaust is poorly understood, and reading of it's full extent will not be easy. Learn the key details of the pact signed in 1939 between hitler and stalin that enabled a one-front war when germany invaded poland and started wwii.
To what extent was adolf hitler a ‘weak dictator’ the aim of this essay is to discuss and to consider whether the statement that hitler was indeed a weak dictator holds true or is in fact a somewhat sweeping term to use when one considers what hitler actually achieved as master of the third reich. There is no question that stalin’s purges were violent and savage the question that needs to be asked is whether a mental illness can explain stalin’s ability to engage in such behavior since the end of his life there has been speculation that a mental illness contributed to stalin’s brutishness. The totalitarian view of the purges is that stalin’s personality was central to the way the purges were carried out and the extent to which they were carried out however the revisionists take the view that stalin’s personality and paranoia is not a sufficient enough reason for the cause of the purges. Although hitler and stalin shared some clear parallelisms, their personalities, the effectiveness of leadership and specific regimes were fairly distinct rather than similar the first part of this essay will concentrate on the analysis of various historiographical interpretations, focusing on the intentionalist view, to critically assess the.
Hitler and his aides were, in general, much younger than other leading politicians in 1931, for instance, 40% of all nazis were under thirty years of age, 70% were under 40 this is quite different from what we would find in stalinist russia at the same time. Stalin knowing that stalin was the only one gutsy enough to attack hitler and stop him right on his tracks he agreed to the pact w stalin until he had annexed enough land so that he can be powerful enough to turn against stalin and take over russia and all that was east of mother russia because hitler saw the east as the world's breadbasket. During the period leading up to world war ii, there were two men who were on opposing sides, the men were adolph hitler and joseph stalin these men were each triumphant in their rise to power in their countries and they were very comparable in the ways that they succeeded.
Bloodlands is a new kind of european history, presenting the mass murders committed by the nazi and stalinist regimes as two aspects of a single history, in the time and place where they occurred. Playlist totalitarian governments: comparing tools and actions of totalitarian leaders (1073) resource slideshow: stalin, hitler and mussolini comparison slideshow: stalin, hitler and mussolini comparison created by summit history more in totalitarian governments: comparing tools and actions of totalitarian leaders (1073. First, to what extent were the ideologies and regimes associated with lenin and stalin similar and thus both part of communism second, to what extent were the movements of mussolini and hitler the same.
This showed that stalin's government did not reflect the will of every individual in the soviet unionlike stalin, hitler's 's government reflected the will of the people to a small extent although hitler was for the the germans, he hurt more people then helped. Hitler and stalin were both part of the socialist wholecaust (of which the holocaust was a part): stalin, mao and hitler (see the work of the historian dr rex curry) stalin and hitler were allies in a pact to divide up europe, invading poland together in 1939, spreading wwii. To what extent did hitler’s foreign policy, 1933-1939, contribute to the outbreak of world war ii what were the economic and social problems of britain during the inter-war years and/or what was the impact of world war ii on its civilian population.